Experimental prototype — not an official warning system

Gold Coast

Gold Coast, QLD · City of Gold Coast · Relative human–shark interaction conditions

← East coast corridorGold CoastMOCKAssessed 7 Nov 2026, 7:48 pmModel 0.1.0-dev

Bull shark conditions

ELEVATEDConfidence VERY LOWbull-shark-0.1-dev

Bull shark ecological conditions are assessed as ELEVATED (development model bull-shark-0.1-dev) with very low confidence. This is not an attack probability and is not the mixed-species 0–100 interaction index.

Factors increasing conditions

  • Coastal SST ~23.0°C is in a range treated as increasingly relevant for bull sharks (hypothesis, not a threshold).
  • Recent rainfall proxy is elevated (catchment runoff hypothesis).

Factors reducing conditions

  • No live authorised bull-shark detections in vShark.

Uncertainty

  • EAC / current velocity is a candidate variable and is not connected.
  • Acoustic receiver health is UNKNOWN — SharkSmart/IMOS tracking is not machine-connected.
  • River discharge gauges are not connected; rainfall is only a proxy.

Environmental indicators are not confirmed shark observations. This is not an attack prediction and is not the mixed-species 0–100 index.

Current state
MODERATE25/100

Experimental · uncalibrated

Confidence: MODERATE(58%)

Evidence freshness: 7 Nov 2026, 7:48 pm

Dominant evidence class for the index: Historical seasonal association

Why?

  • •Area roll-up of 1 sub-locations (0.5×max + 0.5×mean public index)
  • •Highest localised index: Nerang / Broadwater (25/100 · MODERATE)
  • •Sub-location precision limited where data is MOCK or incomplete
  • •Water temperature (~22.5°C) favours tiger shark thermal suitability

Gold Coast interaction risk is a development roll-up of 1 sub-locations (0.5*max(child publicIndex)+0.5*mean(child publicIndex); conf=min(child); hazard=max(child)). Public index 25/100 — MODERATE. Combined confidence moderate. Sub-location data may be MOCK or incomplete; this is not an operational warning system. Always follow lifeguard instructions and official NSW shark-safety advice. vShark is not a government or SLSA product.

Location map

Species conditions

No species contribution breakdown for this assessment.

Bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas) corridor node. Estuarine and coastal use is an ecological basis; migration pulse is a hypothesis to be tested.

Recent detections / sightings

No shark observations are stored for this location. That is a data gap, not evidence that sharks are absent. SharkSmart WA is not machine-connected.

CACHED rows are curated public notices, not a live tagged-shark feed, and do not enter the 0–100 as live detections.

Environmental state

  • air_temperatureLIVE27.8 °C11 Nov 2026, 8:30 pm
  • rainfall_24hLIVE13.4 mm11 Nov 2026, 8:30 pm
  • rainfall_7dLIVE19.8 mm11 Nov 2026, 8:30 pm
  • sstLIVE23 °C11 Nov 2026, 8:30 pm
  • swell_heightLIVE0.98 m11 Nov 2026, 8:30 pm
  • wind_direction_degLIVE343 deg11 Nov 2026, 8:30 pm
  • wind_speed_knLIVE5.8 kn11 Nov 2026, 8:30 pm

Human exposure

Class
unknown
Popularity proxy
unknown
Model exposure
0.45

Estimated, not observed counts. No false precision.

Persistent spatial context

  • beach
  • estuary

Geomorphology is persistent context, not a transient observation.

Data gaps

  • sub location live feeds

Missing data reduces confidence; it does not mean low risk.

Nested locations

  • Nerang / BroadwaterMODERATE

Nearby locations

Data coverage

Where vShark knows little is as important as where it knows more. Missing coverage does not mean low risk.

  • Shark observation coverageNONE

    NSW SharkSmart is not connected. MOCK detections do not enter the score.

  • Ocean coverageMODERATE

    Open-Meteo marine at the Northern Beaches centroid.

  • Weather coverageMODERATE

    Open-Meteo weather at the Northern Beaches centroid.

  • Ecology coverageLOW

    iNaturalist and climatologies are labelled context and do not enter the score.

  • Human exposure coverageLOW

    Provisional calendar and swell proxy only.

  • Sensor coverageNONE

    No authorised detection network connected.

  • Historical coverageLOW

    Assessment history is append-only from this prototype, not a long operational archive.

NOW / HISTORY — recent assessments

Append-only model outputs. New model versions do not rewrite these rows.

WhenBandIndexConfidenceModel
7 Nov 2026, 7:48 pmMODERATE25MODERATE0.1.0-dev
5 Nov 2026, 2:08 amMODERATE25MODERATE0.1.0-dev
26 Oct 2026, 9:30 amMODERATE25MODERATE0.1.0-dev
19 Oct 2026, 3:08 amMODERATE25MODERATE0.1.0-dev
16 Oct 2026, 7:02 pmMODERATE25MODERATE0.1.0-dev
13 Oct 2026, 6:38 pmMODERATE25MODERATE0.1.0-dev
9 Oct 2026, 8:09 pmMODERATE25.5MODERATE0.1.0-dev
9 Oct 2026, 6:24 pmMODERATE25.5MODERATE0.1.0-dev
5 Oct 2026, 7:31 amMODERATE25.5MODERATE0.1.0-dev
4 Oct 2026, 1:17 pmMODERATE25.5MODERATE0.1.0-dev
1 Oct 2026, 11:21 pmMODERATE25.5MODERATE0.1.0-dev
27 Sept 2026, 11:53 amMODERATE25.5MODERATE0.1.0-dev
26 Sept 2026, 10:24 amMODERATE25.5MODERATE0.1.0-dev
22 Sept 2026, 1:28 pmMODERATE25.5MODERATE0.1.0-dev

Evidence hierarchy

  1. Direct recent detection — Tagged receiver, verified instrument detection, or equivalent in the relevant window.
  2. Verified sighting — Sighting confirmed by a responsible authority or trained observer.
  3. Multiple corroborated observations — Independent reports that agree in space and time.
  4. Strong ecological proxy — Prey aggregation, carcass, or similar with documented association — still a proxy.
  5. Environmental habitat suitability — Temperature, depth, and similar suitability — not presence.
  6. Historical seasonal association — Climatology / phenology prior. Not a live observation.
  7. Long-term background prevalence — Baseline occurrence in the region. Weakest for now-casting.

Methodology

Relative interaction risk, not attack probability. Official advice outranks this page. Methodology · Data sources